Showing posts with label style. Show all posts
Showing posts with label style. Show all posts

Friday, October 26, 2012

Brad Pitt needed new hair-cut, better clothes & a sensible script for Chanel 5 ad!




Brad Pitt Chanel Ad Goes Viral

My Comments:

Were the bosses at Chanel drunk or drugged when they approved the new Chanel 5 perfume ad campaign with celebrity endorser Hollywood actor Brad Pitt? The actor looked so unkempt, tired or washed-out or as if he had a bad day!  And he got US$7 million dollars for this ad as the first ever male celebrity endorser for this brand! It's also bad for Brad!!!  

Brad Pitt was also mouthing seemingly incoherent sentences or words which puzzled me about what he meant. What was the point of all those phrases or words? Was he mangling English or logic? Was he lost in his thoughts, tired or in a daze?

Wouldn't it have been better if Brad Pitt wore a fashionable suit or even better-looking and elegant other attire? Shouldn't Chanel the luxury brand be associated with luxury and elegance?

Or was that the original and clever intention all along, to befuddle and confuse the world so that the buzz could spread the Chanel 5 ad globally like wildfire?

Wouldn't the photos below look better for a Chanel 5 ad campaign featuring Brad Pitt?














Below is an article on the new Chanel 5 ad...

Brad Pitt. Chanel Ad. Bigger Holiday Sales. Inevitable: Retail


Chanel No. 5 Ad Unleashes a Flood of Funny Parodies
A Chanel No. 5 ad featuring a scruffy Brad Pitt riffing on the meaning of timelessness has divided the globe. Is it simply pretentious? Or is it a bold departure for the French luxury-goods maker?


Brad Pitt Chanel Ad Goes Viral

Brad Pitt Chanel Ad Goes Viral
Chanel via Bloomberg
Actor Brad Pitt appears in an advertisement for the Chanel No. 5 fragrance.


Brad Pitt Chanel Ad Goes Viral

Sam Taylor Johnson/Chanel via Bloomberg
Actor Brad Pitt stands on the set during the shoot for the Chanel No. 5 fragrance advertisement.


Industry consultants are all over the map. Most agree on one point, though: boosting awareness of the women’s fragrance - - especially among guys with an appreciation for Pitt’s fiancee, Angelina Jolie -- probably will spur holiday sales of Chanel SAS’s best-known product.

The black-and-white commercial, which debuted this month, has gone viral, with more than 4.64 million views on YouTube, and spawned a raft of parodies. U.S. television show Saturday Night Live last weekend broadcast a spoof in which an actor sporting Pitt’s long hair and goatee mimics the ad to tout the Dorito-shell tacos sold by Yum! Brands Inc.'s Taco Bell chain.

The campaign “taps into a whole other consumer for whom Chanel No. 5 wouldn’t necessarily be front of mind,” said Jane Kellock, acting managing editor of product and design at researcher Stylus in London. The fragrance is “something that women know about and men don’t,” she said, adding that most women won’t be alienated by the ad because Pitt is handsome, even if using the celebrity is “a bit gimmicky.”

Fourth-quarter marketing is crucial for luxury goods makers as they seek to lure shoppers in the biggest selling period of the year. Fragrances are an important gift item for department stores from Macy's Inc. to Le Bon Marché in Paris, a retail segment that’s heavily dependent on November and December sales.

Men Seduced

The choice of Pitt, 48, “can serve to make guys more comfortable going to the fragrance counter,” said Andrew Sacks, founder of a namesake luxury ad agency in New York. “It makes it both cool and gives confidence to the male gift-giver.”

Film Director Joe Wright, known for his movies “Pride and Prejudice,” “Atonement” and the upcoming “Anna Karenina,” plus two Keira Knightley Coco Mademoiselle commercials, was commissioned to direct several films for No. 5, which “capture the memories, thoughts and dreams of a man being seduced by a fragrance,” Chanel said in an Oct. 15 statement.

Kate Shone, a New York-based spokeswoman for closely held Chanel, declined to comment on the campaign. Pitt was paid $7 million, plus Chanel planned to spend $10 million on U.S. advertising, Women’s Wear Daily reported Oct. 5, citing unidentified industry sources.

Chanel, revived by designer Karl Lagerfeld, doesn’t publicly disclose financial information. It ranked as the fourth most valuable luxury brand with a value of $6.68 billion, according to Millward Brown Optimor’s 2012 BrandZ study published in May.

Visually Unappealing

While Chanel, which sells mainly women’s products, should be applauded for boldly basing the campaign around a man, “I was surprised how visually unappealing he looks and simply don’t understand styling him to look so disheveled,” said Jose Bandujo, president of Bandujo Advertising & Design in New York.

“It’s as if he came to the set after shooting a movie all day,” he said. “Maybe it was an attempt to continue the idea of being different, but it just doesn’t seem to fit the sophistication and elegance of the brand.”
Daniel Spinosa, a 25-year-old medical student at Columbia University in New York, was puzzled by the script.

In the ad, Pitt says: “It’s not a journey, every journey ends but we go on. The world turns and we turn with it. Plans disappear, dreams take over. But wherever I go, there you are. My luck, my fate, my fortune. Chanel No. 5. Inevitable.”

“Maybe I am a simpleton,” Spinosa said. “It was unclear to me what was ‘inevitable.’”

Money’s Worth

Pitt’s monologue has no relevance to the product, said Tom Julian, a retail expert and brand consultant with a namesake firm in New York. The campaign would have worked better if Pitt had voiced over a montage of images showing more of the world of the brand and the fragrance, he said.

“Right now global brands should be telling some type of story,” said Julian, who is skeptical the campaign will boost Chanel holiday sales. Still, “they are certainly getting their money’s worth with eyeballs.”

The debate spawned by the Pitt ad has “been featured by practically every major U.S. and U.K.
publication, far exceeding the original projected reach of this campaign,” said Jessica Matthias, an account director at PR consultant Wordville Ltd. in London. “This coverage, when measured against the advertising rates of these publications, would most likely run into the hundreds of millions.”

Get Lucky

Chanel No. 5 is the world’s most famous fragrance, and made its debut in 1921, Chanel’s release said. Coco Chanel asked the perfumer, Ernest Beaux, to create a fragrance that reflected her “very modern fashion philosophy.” Five was her lucky number and it was the fifth submission presented to her on the fifth day of the fifth month of the year, hence the name of the fragrance, it said.

Ultimately, the ad will work if guys consider No. 5 when they’re looking for a gift to please their significant others for the holidays, said Doug Harrison, chief executive officer of Harrison Group LLC, a Waterbury, Connecticut-based luxury research and consulting firm.

“If Brad Pitt can keep Angelina Jolie happy and satisfied, so can other guys,” he said. “Guys think, ‘It is going to be great for me.’”

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Sorry girls, it's us GUYS who are driving fashion as the fastest-growing segment in online commerce!

 

I'd like to clarify that first of all, I'm the least fashion-conscious man on earth, serious. Not that I'm sloppy or anything like that, it's just that I'm so busy and preoccupied with many more things like business concerns or intellectual pursuits and saving the world, etc. which I feel are so much more important than how I wear clothes, choice of footwear or how I style my hair.

Seriously, I came across a fascinating news report from Bloomberg---you are right, it's the seemingly boring news site which I find highly interesting and very reliable for world news on all topics---which made me pause to think that maybe it's time for me to be more fashion-conscious?

This is the rationale behind this new blog on fashion by a fashion-curious guy.

So, let's exchange fashion informations, trends, news and opinions here? Deal?





There are so many male fashion brands, it's not true only women are vain, perhaps guys are truly more vain!







Let me share this news article by Sarah Frier:

Male Shoppers Outdo Women as Web Offers Haven From Mall

Spencer Platt/Getty Images
Men shop at a clothing store in New York City.

Fashion is the fastest-growing segment of online commerce, and it’s being propelled by an atypical source: men.
 Thrillist Founder Ben Lerer
Thrillist founder Ben Lerer (Scott Eells/Bloomberg)

Thrillist Founder Ben Lerer

Men who have had to live with department stores designed primarily for women are flocking to websites such as Bonobos and Thrillist that push convenience and a fast shopping experience. And these sites are capturing a growing part of the $41 billion fashion e-commerce market by providing services like recommending items based on personality or shipping trunks of clothes to a guy’s home so he can pick.
“Men don’t hate fashion, they just hate shopping the way it’s designed for women,” said Ben Lerer, founder of Thrillist, which gives men tips for activities or products and then sells them. “The young generation of guys love to shop, they love to talk about the brands they like and they really care about how they look.”

While women’s share of the online clothing market is still more than double men’s, the men’s market is growing faster, at a 13 percent annual rate compared with 10 percent for women, according to NPD Group, a consumer tracking service. And that growth gap is seen by many as about to get wider.

“It’s an area of e-commerce that companies are only just now starting to really figure out,” said Joshua Goldman of Norwest Venture Partners, who specializes in retail deals.

Competing for Share

Male-focused online fashion startups are competing with established brands like Gap, Inc.'s Banana Republic and J Crew Group Inc. for a slice of the fashion e-commerce market. The market for clothing and accessories is expected to grow 78 percent to $73 billion by 2016, according to EMarketer. That’s faster than categories like electronics or music.

Frank & Oak, a Montreal-based men’s site that gives personalized recommendations each month, said last week it raised $5 million from investors. The site launched in February. Thrillist raised $13 million in August from venture capitalists, valuing the company at $150 million in its first round of funding.

Lerer, founder of Thrillist, acquired clothing site JackThreads to get in on the trend. Now, he said, his users snap pictures modeling new clothes and post them on Twitter, bragging about getting them delivered to their doorstep.

The boom in men’s fashion follows by a couple years the success of companies that started out catering to women, like Gilt Groupe and Rent the Runway. Men may be a better target because they are more likely to make big purchases in one swoop to get shopping done quickly, while women often browse recreationally and may not buy, said Jeremy Liew of Lightspeed Venture Partners, which invests in Bonobos.

“Because of that relatively high basket-size, that makes it quite an attractive transaction if you’re talking about several hundred dollars,” Liew said.

More Income

Men are also staying single longer, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, meaning they have more income to spend on themselves during their early careers. Gilt Groupe, a high-end sales site that started out focused on women, added a men’s section in 2008. The typical shopper is 35 years old and single, living in an urban coastal city and making a bit more than $100,000, said Keith George, who heads up the division.

Still, there are risks. And not every idea pans out. Frank & Oak first tried out the market as Modasuite, which made personalized men’s clothes. Gilt has stopped investing in its separate men’s site, Park & Bond.

Yet there’s been enough success for the companies to attract investments from Silicon Valley’s venture capitalists. Brian O’Malley of Battery Ventures said he’s attracted to a more stable revenue stream than most technology startups, like ad- supported social networking companies.

Shipping Clothes

The menswear sites are testing business models like personality-based recommendation or shipping clothes to a guy’s home so he can pick, a service offered by Trunk Club, Inc. Although they’re not typical technology companies, investors like O’Malley are attracted to the growth potential.
“Day one you’re getting real revenue from the product,” said O’Malley, who invests in J. Hilburn, which sends representatives to measure men at their homes and make customized clothes. “A lot of the other companies are reliant on venture capital and don’t make a lot of money from advertising until they have a ton of users.”

‘Finance Guy’

Andy Dunn, the founder and CEO of Bonobos, says after one or two questions his retailers can tell whether a customer fits into one of six categories, which include “metrosexual or gay,” “finance guy” and, more recently, “hipster.” Depending on the label, they’ll be pitched a different kind of pants.
“I hear about a new menswear e-commerce thought every day,” Dunn said. “But to know that this could work in 2007 was really a leap of faith.’
Because they don’t require intensive computer engineering to start, many of the companies are based outside of the San Francisco Bay Area. Thrillist and Bonobos are based in New York, where they can take advantage of its fashion network.
“Think of the computer programmer, and then think of the banker,” Lerer said. “Fashion is much more likely to be a top focus here in New York.”


To contact the reporter on this story: Sarah Frier in New York at sfrier1@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Nick Turner at nturner7@bloomberg.net